Brain Circulation

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2021  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 187--193

Colchicine for the prevention of ischemic stroke: An updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials


Ayman Al-Atta1, Michal Kuzemczak2, Mohammad Alkhalil3 
1 Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK
2 Department of Medical Rescue, Chair of Emergency Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan; Department of Invasive Cardiology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland
3 Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital; Vascular Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK

Correspondence Address:
Mohammad Alkhalil
Department of Cardiothoracic Services, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne NE7, 7DN
UK

BACKGROUND: Inflammation is increasingly recognized as a target to reduce residual cardiovascular risk. Colchicine is an anti-inflammatory drug that was associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. However, its effect on stroke reduction was not consistent across studies. Therefore, the aim of this study-level meta-analysis was to evaluate the influence of colchicine on stroke in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Electronic databases were searched through October 2020, to identify randomized controlled trials using colchicine in patients with CAD. The incidence of clinical endpoints such as stroke, death, myocardial infarction (MI), study-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and atrial fibrillation (AF) was compared between colchicine and placebo groups. RESULTS: A total number of 11,594 (5,806 in the colchicine arm) patients from 4 eligible studies were included in the final analysis. Stroke incidence was lower in the colchicine arm compared to placebo (rate ratio [RR] 0.48 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29–0.78], P = 0.003) whereby no significant difference was observed in the incidence of AF (odds ratio [OR] 0.86 [95% CI, 0.69–1.06], P = 0.16). Furthermore, a significant effect of colchicine on MACE [RR 0.65 (95% CI, 0.51–0.83), P = 0.0006] and MI (RR 0.65 (95% CI, 0.54–0.95], P = 0.02) was detected, with no influence on all-cause mortality (RR 1.04 [95% CI, 0.61–1.78], P = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis confirms a significant influence of colchicine on stroke in CAD patients. Despite its neutral effect on AF occurrence, other mechanisms related to plaque stabilization are plausible. The concept seems to be supported by contemporaneous MI reduction and posits that anti-inflammatory properties of colchicine may translate into a reduction of stroke risk.


How to cite this article:
Al-Atta A, Kuzemczak M, Alkhalil M. Colchicine for the prevention of ischemic stroke: An updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Brain Circ 2021;7:187-193


How to cite this URL:
Al-Atta A, Kuzemczak M, Alkhalil M. Colchicine for the prevention of ischemic stroke: An updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Brain Circ [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 19 ];7:187-193
Available from: http://www.braincirculation.org/article.asp?issn=2394-8108;year=2021;volume=7;issue=3;spage=187;epage=193;aulast=Al-Atta;type=0